Legal Opinion
Reed v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1923No. 17805PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— Respondents, as plaintiffs, sought by this action to have the defendants declared to be trustees holding the legal title to a certain forty-acre tract of land in Whatcom county for their use and benefit; to enforce conveyance of the legal title to them; and to have their title quieted as against the claims of the defendants. The defendant St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Company was not served with process, and did not appear. The defendant Director General of Railroads filed a disclaimer; and the defendant Great Northern Railway Company filed an answer and cross-complaint alleging…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Whitney v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1926