Legal Opinion
Mark v. City & County of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1953No. NOS. 2873, 2874PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
STAINBACK, J.
These two cases were consolidated for trial as they involved the same facts as to the alleged negligence of the defendants.
The original complaints allege that the City and County of Honolulu maintained in the conduct of its business as a municipal corporation an electric-light system for the purpose of lighting the public highway, to wit, Kamehameha highway at Punaluu, Oahu; that the city negligently maintained the insulators on light fix tures located on certain poles in that the same were so corroded that electricity leaped out into the lighting fixture…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Fleming v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Coburn v. San Mateo CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
- Barree v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kahale v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Kamau Ex Rel. Lovell v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
- Iokepa v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1958
- Kahale v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Kahale v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004