Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kahale v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2004No. 23934Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.,

with whom Circuit Judge CHAN joins.

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision to “overrule the holding of Salavea v. City & County of Honolulu, 55 Haw. 216, 221, 517 P.2d 51, 54-55 (1973)[.]”1 Majority opinion at 343, 90 P.3d at 235. The effect of the decision is to abrogate, without a showing of compelling justification, a thirty-year rule of law establishing that tort claims against a county are subject to the two-year statute of limitations set forth in Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 662-4 of the State Tort Liability Act (STLA). The…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API