Legal Opinion

Muhammad Sabir v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 26, 2005No. 04-2486PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Muhammad Sabir, a Pakistani who stayed in the United States longer than authorized, was ordered in absentia to be removed when he failed to appear at his removal hearing. He moved to reopen the hearing because he did not receive the notice of its date and time. The immigration judge (IJ) found the notice adequate based on evidence of its attempted delivery. As we have recently emphasized, however, the relevant question in deciding a motion to reopen is not whether the notice was “adequate,” but whether it was actually received. Because the IJ’s analysis ignored the latter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kalpana S. Joshi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Abida Pervaiz v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Allen M. Wijeratne, Formerly Known as Allen M. Lowe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Gurung v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gomez-Palacios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Giorgi Maghradze v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. M-R-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
  4. Peralta-Cabrera v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Sanchez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API