Legal Opinion
Gurung v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2004No. 03-9574PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
An immigration judge (IJ) entered an order in absentia removing petitioner Da-mar Bahadur Gurung to Nepal after Mr. Gurung failed to appear at a scheduled hearing. Mr. Gurung then unsuccessfully sought to reopen his case. In this court, proceeding pro se, he seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the IJ’s refusal to reopen the removal proceedings. We affirm. 1
I
Mr. Gurung entered the United States in December 2000 with authorization to remain in this country until June 2001. He overstayed Ms authorization period, and in October 2002 filed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. DaccarettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Regina Salta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Youssef Adib Farhoud v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Giorgi Maghradze v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Infanzon v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Edson Silva-Carvalho Lopes v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Kalpana S. Joshi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Abida Pervaiz v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.