Legal Opinion
M-R-A
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2008No. ID 3628PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 665
(BIA 2008) Interim Decision #3628 Matter of M-R-A-, Respondent Decided October 31, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where a Notice to Appear or Notice of Hearing is properly addressed and sent by regular mail according to normal office procedures, there is a presumption of delivery, but it is weaker than the presumption that applies to documents sent by certified mail. Matter of Grijalva,
21 I&N Dec. 27
(BIA 1995), distinguished. (2) When an Immigration Judge adjudicates a respondent’s motion to reopen…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Regina Salta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- GRIJALVABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
- Anin v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- A-S-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Roberto Mauricio-Benitez v. Jefferson Sessions, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Melsi Garcia Nunez v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Anthony Thompson v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- AkhmedovBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- Renaut v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.