Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 26, 2012No. 27173Published

1DissentJustice Pleicones

I respectfully dissent. Although I am sympathetic with the majority’s desire to protect Petitioner’s right to jury trial, in my view our precedents compel affirmation of the post-conviction relief (PCR) court.

The question whether a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to jury trial is determined not only from the trial record but also from the record of the PCR hearing. See Harres v. Leeke, 282 S.C. 131, 133, 318 S.E.2d 360, 361 (1984) (“[T]he voluntariness of a guilty plea is not determined by an examination of the specific inquiry made by the sentencing judge alone, but is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harres v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Roddy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Spoone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API