Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1994No. 24169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Pursuant to White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E. (2d) 35 (1974), we granted certiorari to review Brown’s conviction for murder. Brown claims that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to testify at trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On the afternoon of March 15, 1990, Brown and Stephanie Wigfall (“victim”) were drinking brandy and preparing dinner *271at Brown’s residence. The telephone rang and the victim started to answer it. Brown became angry and an argument ensued. Brown left the residence intending to ride around in his automobile. The victim followed him. The argument…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. RochevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. RaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. OrrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Napoleon Momon v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. DialSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API