Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Commissioner of Correction

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 9, 1991No. 90-P-374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 1969, the plaintiff received two concurrent indeterminate life sentences and four consecutive “from and after” determinate sentences, all to be served in State prison.2 By a petition for habeas corpus3, he chal*1012lenged the parole board’s policy of refusing to hold a parole hearing until after he has served the combined total of the minimum sentences for the life sentences and each of the determinate “from and after” sentences, a total of more than thirty-one years. A judge of the Superior Court dismissed the petition, ruling that the plaintiff was not eligible for parole until the year 2000.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Maurice R. Lerner v. Matthew Gill, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Champagne v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Henschel v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Crooker v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Latessa, MCICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Goetzendanner v. SuperintendentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Stewart v. Chairman of the Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. ProulxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Hamm v. Latessa, MCICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API