Legal Opinion

Goetzendanner v. Superintendent

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 10, 2008No. 06-P-1621PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

Darrien Goetzendanner was at liberty on parole from concurrent, twenty-year reformatory sentences2 when he committed additional offenses for which he was arrested and *534held in lieu of bail; he was convicted of these new offenses and intervening sentences were imposed.3 The question raised by this appeal is whether the Department of Correction (department) has improperly required that Goetzendanner first complete the balance of his reformatory sentences before he serves his intervening sentences.

Goetzendanner claims that applicable law dictates that he first complete his intervening sentences…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Pina v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Brach v. Chief Justice of District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SelavkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. WaltersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. HallinanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
  4. Commonwealth v. TinsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2021
  5. Commonwealth v. WaltersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API