Legal Opinion

Crooker v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

At the time he filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Stephen S. Crooker was serving three five-year sentences at M.C.I., Norfolk. One sentence (the “A sentence”) was for burning a motor vehicle with intent to defraud an insurer (G. L. c. 266, § 10). The other two (the “B sentences”) were for conspiracy to assist in the forgery of identification papers for a driver’s license (Crooker used the name of a person who had died in infancy between 1930 and 1935) and assisting another falsely to procure a driver’s license. See G. L. c. 90, § 24B. Each sentence was for five years at M.C.I.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Pina v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Hennessy v. SUPERINTENDENT, MASS. CORRECTIONAL INST.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  2. Barriere v. HubbardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  4. Covington v. Omni Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API