Hackett v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Earl Ray Hackett appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.
We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Whether Hackett was afforded effective assistance of appellate counsel.
2. Whether Ind.Code 11 — 13—3—2(b)(3), the parole eligibility statute, is unconstitutional as applied to Hackett.
FACTS
Haekett was convicted of two counts of murder in the first degree for which he received concurrent life sentences. Our supreme court affirmed his convictions on direct appeal in Hackett v. State, 266 Ind. 103, 360 N.E.2d 1000 (1977). His subsequent petition for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Schiro v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lacey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Steven Clippinger v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Sharkey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Seay v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Haggard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.