Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Zieman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The plaintiff alleges in his bill that he and the defendants were partners in a building enterprise, and asks for an accounting and for the cancellation of mortgages held by Max J. Zieman, one of the partners. The defendant Max Zieman admitted being in partnership with the plaintiff, but the defendant Max J. Zieman denied it, and contended that he was simply a mortgagee of premises owned by the partnership. The finding of the master that Max J. Zieman is only a mortgagee and not a partner disposes of the ground of the original bill as against Max J. Zieman, and the plaintiff does not argue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knowlton v. Town of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Rudnick v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Goodman v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Barry v. DowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Barry v. HarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milbank v. J. C. Littlefield, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Chopelas v. ChopelasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Olsen v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Kacouris v. LoukasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- MacNeil Bros. Co. v. Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.