Legal Opinion
MacNeil Bros. Co. v. Cambridge Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This is a bill in equity to redeem from three mortgages held by the defendant on three parcels of real estate owned by the plaintiff. At the time the bill was brought the defendant was in the process of foreclosing the mortgages and had commenced proceedings for authority to do so under the soldiers’ and sailors’ civil relief act of 1940 (U. S. C. [1946 ed.] Title 50, Appendix, § 532) and St. 1943, c. 57, as amended by St. 1945, c. 120. The sole issue was the amount which the plaintiff was required to pay on each mortgage in order to redeem. The judge made findings of material facts in which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Malloy v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Bangs v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Goldberg v. CurhanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Davis v. Continental Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Davidson v. ZiemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Chartrand v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Donaldson v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Moon v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Levenson v. FeuerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.