Legal Opinion

Acme Lumber Co. v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1942No. 6 Div. 995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by employee against employer to recover balance alleged to be due for minimum wage, overtime pay, liquidated damages, and attorney's fee, under the provisions of Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 52 Stat. 1060, §§ 1 to 19,29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 to 219, inclusive. The employer, appellant, challenged the complaint by demurrer, on the ground that it presents no cause of action under said act.

The averments of the complaint pertinent to this inquiry appear in paragraphs 2 and 3, found in the report of the case.

The insistence is, in effect, that the complaint discloses plaintiff's employment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Slover v. WathenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. Olearchick v. American Steel FoundriesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Cudahy Packing Co. of Alabama v. BazanosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Lyons v. H.K. Ferguson Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Ashenford v. L. Yukon & Sons Produce Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API