Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Fox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

Tbe North Carolina Truck Act, being Chapter 1008 of the Session Laws of North Carolina, in Section 1 thereof, codified as G.S. 62-121.5, contains a declaration of policy which reads in pertinent part as follows: “. . . that the transportation of property by motor carriers for compensation over the public highways of the State is a business affected^ with the public interest; that there has been shown a definite public need for the continuation and preservation of all existing motor carrier service, and to that end, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of North Carolina to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Crescent Express Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  5. Peninsula Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API