Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1956No. 251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This appeal derives from the ruling of the North Carolina Utilities Commission on protestants’ motion to dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction of the subject matter. The motion was grounded on the contention that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought unless it is made to appear that Helms Motor Express, Inc., the carrier with whom the petitioner seeks authority to interchange freight, desires to enter into a freight interchange arrangement with the petitioner. The motion was allowed and the proceeding was dismissed on the ground that the following jurisdictional defects…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Dellinger v. BollingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dale v. LattimoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API