Legal Opinion

Mayor & City Council v. Schwing

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 16, 1998No. 83, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

This case arises from an attempt by Joseph Schwing, a Baltimore City firefighter, to recover workers’ compensation benefits for a disablement arising from his cardiovascular disease, which he contends qualifies as a compensable occupational disease under Maryland Code, §§ 9-101(g) and 9-502 of the Labor and Employment Article (1991 Repl. Vol). Baltimore City opposed his effort, principally on limitations grounds. We shall direct that the Workers’ Compensation Commission conduct further proceedings with respect to Mr. Schwing’s March, 1994 claim. To reach that result, we shall *180rev…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Calabria v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Buskirk v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. McLaughlin v. Gill Simpson ElectricCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Frederick County Board of Commissioners v. SautterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API