Legal Opinion

People v. Flieger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 6, 1984No. 3-83-0813PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE ALLOY

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a paternity action brought against the defendant, David Flieger, pursuant to the provisions of the Illinois Paternity Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 40, par. 1354.) At the time the complaint was filed, the mother and child were, and are, residents of Tazewell County. The defendant, served with summons in the State of Colorado, filed a special and limited appearance praying that service of summons be quashed because the Illinois court lacked in personam jurisdiction.

In an order entered December 9, 1983, the circuit court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cessna v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Poindexter v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Jude v. MorrisseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rainsberger v. McFaddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People Ex Rel. Mangold v. FliegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Marriage of HighsmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. In Re the Marriage of BushawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Garcia v. DaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API