Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Mangold v. Flieger

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1985No. 60781PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

This is a paternity action brought against the defendant, David Flieger, pursuant to the provisions of the Paternity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 1354). The complaint was filed in Tazewell County, where the mother and the child now reside. The defendant resides in Colorado and was served with process in that State. He filed a special limited appearance challenging the jurisdiction of the Illinois court and moved to quash service of process. The circuit court denied the motion to quash but certified the issue for interlocutory appeal pursuant to our Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Poindexter v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Boyer v. BoyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. FliegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rollins v. EllwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Vandeveld v. ChristophDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Wiles v. Morita Iron Works Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. SimsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Rainsberger v. McFaddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API