Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1992No. C9-91-560PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant King Buachee Lee on three counts of third degree criminal sexual conduct as defined by Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(c) (1990) (penetration with force). Lee appeals his convictions, arguing the trial court violated his sixth amendment rights by erroneously applying the marital privilege to exclude all testimony by the victims’ husbands. Lee also contends the trial court abused its discretion in admitting testimony concerning a similar but unrelated criminal prosecution.
FACTS
Lee immigrated from Laos in 1976, and has worked part-time as a Hmong…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993