Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fassler

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1980No. Civ. 4475PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CONN, J. *

Appellants brought an action in the court below seeking declaratory relief and a determination of invalidity of a prepayment penalty clause in a promissory note and other documents in a land sale transaction. After respondents filed their answer, all parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied appellants’ motion and granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. Appellants now appeal from the order and judgment.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining that a 50 percent prepayment penalty is enforceable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Lazzareschi Investment Co. v. San Francisco Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re AJ Lane & Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  2. Pacific Trust Co. TTEE v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. McCausland v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Garver v. BraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. Pic'lCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API