Legal Opinion

Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 21, 2007No. 04 C 5312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES B. MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT”) brought suit against eS-peed, Inc., ITSEcco Holdings Limited, Ecco LLC, and EccoWare Ltd. (collectively “eSpeed”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304 (’304) and 6,882,132 (T32). Both parties have filed a number of summary judgment motions in an attempt to limit the scope of the trial. Today we deal with the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment of invalidity/validity. Defendants assert that GL Win with Trade Pad constitutes prior art, and that such…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Air Safety, Inc. v. Teachers Realty Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Stena Drilling Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API