Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT”) brought suit against eS-peed, Inc., ITSEcco Holdings Limited, Ecco LLC, and EccoWare Ltd. (collectively “eSpeed”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304 (’304) and 6,882,132 (T32). Both parties have filed a number of summary judgment motions in an attempt to limit the scope of the trial. Today we deal with the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment of invalidity/validity. Defendants assert that GL Win with Trade Pad constitutes prior art, and that such…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Air Safety, Inc. v. Teachers Realty Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Stena Drilling Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009