Legal Opinion

Van v. Town of Manitowoc Rapids

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-2248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

This appeal concerns sec. 88.87(2), Stats., which imposes a duty on governmental entities to refrain from impeding the general flow of water in an unreasonable manner when constructing or maintaining highways or railroad beds. The statute creates a remedy for property owners who claim damages for violating this statute and establishes certain procedures to be followed in making a claim. Because Carl and Judith Van did not follow these procedures prior to commencing a lawsuit, the trial court granted summary judgment against them. We hold that these procedures are a mandatory condition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schaut v. Joint School District No. 6 of Lena & Little RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Local Union No. 2490 v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Boyer v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. The Yacht Club at Sister Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Village of Sister BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Office of the Commissioner of RailroadsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API