Van v. Town of Manitowoc Rapids
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
This appeal concerns sec. 88.87(2), Stats., which imposes a duty on governmental entities to refrain from impeding the general flow of water in an unreasonable manner when constructing or maintaining highways or railroad beds. The statute creates a remedy for property owners who claim damages for violating this statute and establishes certain procedures to be followed in making a claim. Because Carl and Judith Van did not follow these procedures prior to commencing a lawsuit, the trial court granted summary judgment against them. We hold that these procedures are a mandatory condition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Schaut v. Joint School District No. 6 of Lena & Little RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Local Union No. 2490 v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Boyer v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- The Yacht Club at Sister Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Village of Sister BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Office of the Commissioner of RailroadsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.