Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriquez-Perez

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1996No. 21447PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal presents two issues. First, we must determine whether the State engages in vindictive prosecution, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, if a prosecutor carries out a threat made during plea negotiations to obtain a new indictment on a more serious charge if the defendant will not plead guilty to the original charge. The second issue is whether the defendant was denied his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial when a period of more than thirteen months elapsed between his date of arrest and his trial date.

I

THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE WAS NOT VIOLATED…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. McNewIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Brett J. JacobsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API