State v. Rodriquez-Perez
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal presents two issues. First, we must determine whether the State engages in vindictive prosecution, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, if a prosecutor carries out a threat made during plea negotiations to obtain a new indictment on a more serious charge if the defendant will not plead guilty to the original charge. The second issue is whether the defendant was denied his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial when a period of more than thirteen months elapsed between his date of arrest and his trial date.
I
THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE WAS NOT VIOLATED…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. McNewIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Brett J. JacobsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.