Legal Opinion

State v. McNew

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1998No. 23078PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENGTSON, Judge Pro Tern.

Following a trial by jury, Paul McNew was found guilty of committing lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen years of age, I.C. § 18-1508. A judgment convicting McNew of such offense was entered imposing a unified sentence of four (4) years, consisting of a fixed term of one (1) year, followed by an indeterminate term of three (3) years.

McNew has appealed the conviction. The basis of this appeal is McNew’s contention that the trial corut erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the criminal information, said motion being predicated upon the grounds that he had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HoltslanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. RussellIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. WengrenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. AvilaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. Brett J. JacobsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API