Legal Opinion

PSI Energy, Inc. v. Roberts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2005No. 49S02-0405-CV-217PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER FROM THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, NO. 49A02-0210-CV-888.

BOEHM, Justice.

William Roberts contracted mesothelio-ma as a result of his work with asbestos-containing insulation as an employee of Armstrong Contracting and Supply Company (ACandS). Much of his work over a thirty-nine year career was at power generation facilities of PSI Energy, Inc. Roberts sued PSI and others on both vicarious liability and premises Hability theories. A jury found PSI thirteen percent at fault without specifying which theory supported that result.

We hold that PSI is not vicariously liable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Van Fossen v. MidAmerican Energy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Illinois Bulk Carrier, Inc. v. Jackson Ex Rel. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API