Legal Opinion
Kent v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 13, 2002No. C-01-3293 JCSPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 12(b)(6) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM BASED ON PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT PREEMPTION AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION [Docket No. 7] AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE [Docket No. 44]
SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss ‘Under Rule 12(b)(6) For Failure To State A Claim (Based On Principles Of Conflict Preemption And The Doctrine Of Primary Jurisdiction) (“Motion To Dismiss”) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (“Motion To Strike”) came on for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.