Legal Opinion

Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 7, 2006No. 06-607 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

Before the Court is a motion by Lockheed Martin Services, Inc. (“Lockheed”) to intervene in the this matter pursuant to the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) Rule 24(a)(2) for the limited purpose of protecting its trade secrets and other *409proprietary information. The Court finds that Lockheed has a sufficient property interest subject to this action, that its ability to protect that interest may be impeded by the action, and that its interest is not adequately represented by the existing parties. Therefore, Lockheed’s motion to intervene…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Aerosonic LLC v. Joby Aero, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  3. Air Borealis Limited Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Red River Science & Technology, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API