Legal Opinion
Oenga v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 13, 2007No. 06-491 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the production or inspection of certain documents, pursuant to Rules 37(a) and 56(f) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), sought in discovery from Intervenor ConoeoPhillips Alaska, Inc. (“CPAI”). For the reasons discussed herein, the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel is hereby GRANTED.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are Native Alaskan Inupiat heirs of Andrew Oenga, now deceased, who was granted a 40-acre Alaska Native Allotment (“Allotment”), Allotment F-14632 Parcel B, as a result of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015