Legal Opinion
Peltz ex rel. Robillard v. New Mexico Department of Health & Social Services
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1976No. 2426PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Appellant and her infant son had been recipients of assistance pursuant to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (AFDC). She voluntarily terminated the assistance because “she wanted to try it on her own.” Her income was $459.33 per month. Adjusted net income was $245.92 per month. Agency standards of need for the two-person household was $160.00 per month. After trying “it on her own” for over four months she reapplied for AFDC. She was then told by her caseworker, for the first time, that she was no longer eligible for AFDC, although her circumstances had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Silver City Consolidated School District No. 1 v. Board of Regents of New Mexico Western CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Carlsbad v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Capo v. Century Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- National Advertising Co v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Green v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Muckey v. New Mexico Department of Human ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Otero v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.