Legal Opinion

Muckey v. New Mexico Department of Human Services

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1985No. 7690PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Appellant Lloyd Muckey, a recipient of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefits, appeals a decision by the New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD) that affirmed county action terminating those benefits. We affirm.

In the summer of 1983 Muckey, on behalf of himself, his wife, and two children, began receiving financial and medical assistance in the amount of $281 monthly through the AFDC program. In August 1983, over a period of three days, the Muckeys received a number of unemployment compensation checks as a result of a successful appeal in another…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. National Welfare Rights Organization v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. New Mexico Human Services Department v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Clyde Jacquet v. Roy E. WesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Agent Orange Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  2. Montano v. New Mexico Real Estate Appraiser's BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Green v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  5. Macias v. New Mexico Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API