Legal Opinion

Cindy L. Hanson v. The City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation Mary Hill, in Her Official Capacity as Court Administrator

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1994No. 94-6089PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 F.3d 1509

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Cindy L. HANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a municipal corporation; Mary

Hill, in her official capacity as Court

Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6089.

U…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Rachel v. TrouttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Harris v. ChernTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ford v. Jackson National LifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Arzate v. City of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API