Legal Opinion
Arzate v. City of Topeka
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 1, 1995No. 93-4128-SACPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
Trial of this case commenced on February 6, 1995. Based upon the agreement of the parties, several joint exhibits were admitted into evidence at the outset of trial. The plaintiff called each of the human defendants in his case-in-chief. The only other witness called by the plaintiff was the plaintiff himself. At the close of the plaintiffs case-in-chief, the court granted the defendants’ motion judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 on all of the plaintiffs claims. Specifically, the court found that the evidence, viewed in the light…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Black v. Columbus Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric Transitions, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Dupont-Lauren v. Schneider (USA), Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Kastel v. Winnetka Bd. of Educ., Dist. 36District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.