Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1990No. 89-5073, 89-6364PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation petitions for a writ of mandamus requiring the district court to vacate its October 5, 1989, order which required the Bureau to turn over an index of documents, identifying matters occurring before a grand jury, to parties in a civil action.

The lawsuit which spawned the controversy before us is an action brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against the accounting firm of Ernst & Whinney. The FDIC action maintains, inter alia, that Ernst & Whinney engaged in negligent accounting practices and professional…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Dassault Systemes, SA v. ChildressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Perrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API