Legal Opinion

Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, Individually

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2005No. 04-5298PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

Regardless of the way this case is captioned, the real dispute is between the City of Memphis (the “City”) and its former police director, Walter Crews, who has also been sued in his individual capacity. The City asserts the attorney-client privilege as to the content of conversations between Crews, while he was police director, and various attorneys employed by the City. However, in the present lawsuit, Crews has raised the advice of counsel as the basis of his qualified immunity defense. Thus, we are asked to determine whether Crews’s invocation of the advice of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Anita Loyd v. Saint Joseph Mercy OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Sandra T.E. v. South Berwyn School District 100Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API