Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1968No. Civ. 11693PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Herein we review an order of respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board denying petitioner relief under the workmen’s compensation provisions of the Labor Code for injuries suffered. Denial of relief was based upon the ground that at the time of the claimed injuries he was not an “employee” as that word is defined in Labor Code, section 3351. Nonemployee status was found upon the fact that petitioner was a jail inmate of the County of Nevada. When the claimed injury was received, however, he had been “loaned out” to Nevada City to work on. its sewerage plant. It was held this was not a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reilly v. OzzardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Van Horn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident CommissionnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Anaheim General Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Parsons v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Castro v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API