Legal Opinion
Dugan & McNamara, Inc. v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 16, 1948No. 9725PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Dugan & McNamara, Inc. (“Corporation”), and several of its officers began this-proceeding in the court below with a petition for a contempt order which also prayed, that a grand jury subpoena duces tecum be quashed. The petition for the contempt order was abandoned, and the cause was-treated below, as on this appeal, as a motion • to quash the subpoena. The appeal follows the denial of the motion.
From the limited record, it appears that, previously certain of the Corporation’s rec*119ords were seized by government agents and were submitted as evidence and considered by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Enprotech Corp. v. RendaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tye v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Di MauroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Grand Jury, and Henry M. Huffman, President, H & M Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. SineiroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.