Legal Opinion
United States v. Di Mauro
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1971No. Nos. 20295, 20384, and 20297PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Ross John Di Mauro, Donald Veryl Jones and Nicholas Sirian, appeal from judgments of conviction rendered against them in the District of Nebraska for criminal contempt pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401 (3)1 and Rule 42(b), Fed.R.Crim.P.2 The contempt charges were tried to a jury pursuant to an information filed by the United States Attorney at the direction of the trial court, and a verdict of guilty was returned. The circumstances leading to the contempt conviction were as follows.
A grand jury was empanelled in Omaha, Nebraska, on January 7, 1969, for the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Finney v. Arkansas Board of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. George Gordon LiddyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Clarence S. Armstrong, William John Williams, and Vincent SammarcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Koehler v. GrantUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Sarah E. Atwell v. Lisle Park DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.