Legal Opinion

State v. . Wallace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The first four exceptions taken by the prisoner question the competency of the testimony offered by the State in proof of the dying declarations of the deceased. The ground of attack is the absence of sufficient evidence to identify the assailant and to bring the declarations within the established rules of law. These exceptions, in our opinion, must be overruled.

Dying declarations are an exception to the rule which rejects hearsay evidence, but the conditions under which they are admitted by the courts have often been defined. At the time they are made the declarant must be in actual danger…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. . HaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  5. State v. . O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . ReddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API