Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Stoke

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

In this defamation action, a former President of Queens College and the New York City Board of Higher Education have interposed a defense of absolute privilege in connection with an allegedly libelous statement they made denying charges that anti-Catholic bias had influenced promotions on the Queens College faculty.

The charges were originally voiced in 1958 and the Board of Higher Education promptly ordered an investigation by a committee, headed by Porter Chandler, Esq., on which the Catholic, Protestant and Jewish faiths were equally represented. The *397committee issued a report sometime…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Hemmens v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Glass v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Clark v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hackworth v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Royer v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Ward Telecommunications & Computer Services, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API