Legal Opinion
Isaacs v. Prince & Wilds
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1923No. 23476PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
The appellant, Mrs. Isaacs, brought suit against Prince & Wilds, a partnership composed of George Prince and O. K. Wilds* for injury to a five-passenger Buick automobile, which automobile was run into and injured by a truck owned by Prince & Wilds but rented by them to the Cum*203berland. Telephone & Telegraph Company under an arrangement by which the Cumberland Company would pay Prince & Wilds ten dollars per day for the truck, which price was to include also the compensation of the driver of the truck. The Cumberland Telephone Company applied to Prince & Wilds for a truck and driver to be used…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Puhlman v. Excelsior Express & Standard Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Greenberg & Bond Co. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Core v. ReshaTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Ash v. Century Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Devaney v. Lawler Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Tulsa v. RandallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Weese v. StoddardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Mitchell v. Eagle Motor Lines, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Bain v. IMC Global Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.