Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Randall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1935No. 25391PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Throughout this opinion, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff, accompanied by two other persons, one of whom owned and was driving- a Ford coupe in which they were riding, were on their way to Mohawk Park to attend a picnic. They were traveling east on the Mohawk road, when at a point between Lewis and Harvard streets in the city of Tulsa they observed a Ford truck, which it developed was owned by defendant and driven by Zack Wright, a regular employee of the defendant, traveling west on the Mohawk road. It appears from the evidence that as the driver…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delory v. BlodgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hasty v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. New v. McMillanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Neff v. BrandeisNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wylie-Stewart MacHinery Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Collier v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Hodges v. HoldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API