Greenberg & Bond Co. v. Yarbrough
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Eulton superior court — Judge Hutcheson. July 1, 1920. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Greenberg &' Bond Company was employed by two brothers to conduct the funeral of their mother, to furnish the coffin and robes and automobiles, and in general to see that the funeral was properly conducted. Greenberg & Bond Company did not .itself own automobiles, but was in the habit of hiring them, in connection with its business, from the Smith Taxicab Company and others. There is some conflict in' the evidence on the question as to whether the automobiles used in the funeral were engaged by Greenberg & Bond Company at the request and as the. agent of the two brothers when they made the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by27 opinions
- Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. SoutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.