Legal Opinion
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 9, 1964No. Nos. 17662, 17663PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board has found certain Picket Line, Struck Goods, Subcontracting, and Hazardous Work clauses in the collective bai’gaining agreements of petitioner unions void under Section 8(e)1 of the Labor Act. In their Petition to Review and Set Aside, the unions contend that these provisions are outside the prohibitions of § 8(e) because their aim is benefit to the employees of the bargaining unit, not control of, or interference with, the contract-ring employer’s third-party relationships. The Board cross-petitions for enforcement.
A…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Rockaway News Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 38, Teamsters Union, Local No. 87, and Arden Farms Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 728, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters v. National Labor Relations Board, Watson-Wilson Transportationsystem, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964