Legal Opinion

Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided July 29, 1992No. 92-30254-RVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

VINSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mary P. Dahl-Eimers, initiated this litigation for declaratory judgment, for injunctive relief, and for damages, against defendant, Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company. The plaintiff is insured under a policy of major medical expense coverage issued by the defendant. The plaintiff has Stage IV breast cancer, and desires to undergo a procedure identified generally as high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant (“HDC-ABMT”), utilizing three chemotherapy drugs known as Ifosfomide, Carbopla-tinum, and Etoposide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sofarelli v. Pinellas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. ShofnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Epstein v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mary P. Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Taylor v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API