Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Kirk

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

39 N.J. Super. 341 (1956)

120 A.2d 854

ROSE T. KIRK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HUGH P. KIRK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 27, 1956.

Decided March 7, 1956.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Otto E. Adolph argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, attorney).

No appearance for defendant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a dismissal after hearing of an uncontested action for divorce on grounds of desertion. The parties were married September 16, 1950.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Akrep v. AkrepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Pisciotta v. BuccinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Armour v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Godfrey v. ShatwellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Munger v. MungerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Pope v. PopeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API