Legal Opinion
United States v. Reyes Portillo-Valenzuela
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1994No. 93-1328PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Reyes Portillo-Valenzuela appeals his sentence for unlawful reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He claims that the district court should have reduced his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines by two or three levels because he accepted responsibility for his crime. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err when it found that Portillo-Valenzuela’s plea of not guilty and insistence on trial to prove his guilt indicated that he had not accepted responsibility for his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kelvin HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. David MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Thomas W. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.