Legal Opinion
King v. Corning Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The amended complaint sets up the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver of the property of John C. Bostleman, Jr., in proceedings supplementary to execution under a judgment obtained by James 0. Sebring.
It is further alleged that the Bostleman Conservatory of Music, a domestic corporation, transferred its property to one Samuel E. Quackenbush in trust, to sell’and dispose of the same for the benefit of the creditors of the corporation; that Quackenbush converted the property into money; that such money is now upon deposit with the defendant; that Quackenbush, as trustee, has assigned to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McPherson v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- New York Security & Trust Co. v. Saratoga Gas & Electric Light Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
- New York Security & Trust Co. v. Saratoga Gas & Electric Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Thatcher v. CandeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Keiley v. . DusenburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. Corning Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927
- Rosenblum v. Warren-Nash Motor Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928