Legal Opinion

King v. Corning Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The authority of a receiver in supplementary proceedings to bring an action is purely statutory, and unless the complaint alleges sufficient facts to satisfy the statutory requirements it does not state a cause of action.

The receiver is appointed by the court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 805.) And upon qualifying the property of the judgment debtor vests in him. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 809.) Unless restricted by the special order of the court, he may sue for and collect all debts and demands belonging to the debtor. He may also sue in the name of the debtor, where it is necessary or proper for him to do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maurice v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  2. King v. Corning Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenblum v. Warren-Nash Motor Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API